Difference between revisions of "Omni History"

From Omni Commons
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Line 18: Line 18:


= Others' efforts to acquire the building =
= Others' efforts to acquire the building =
For most of the two years that the building was known as being available for rent or purchase, it was not officially on the market. During this time a number of interested parties sought to acquire the building. Alternate proposed uses for the building that we now know of variously included: a bowling alley, a movie theater, a live theatre, an orchestra rehearsal space, a co-working space, a burning-man-oriented live/work/party space, several kinds of music or event venues, restaurants, cafes, and bars.
For most of the two years that the building was known as being available to let or purchase, it was not officially on the market, and by the time Omni Commons was involved there was no 'bidding' process as conventionally understood. Rather, the owner was approached directly and independently by a number of interested parties, enticed not only by the unique nature of the property but by the owner's unusual standing offer of a seller-financed loan. To qualify for the owner's loan, prospective buyers were to present the owner with business plans for his consideration. Likewise, those wanting to rent the property also had to present the owner with business plans. To the best of our understanding, it was these business plans as visions for the building, as well as the achievement of mutually-agreeable specific lease or purchase terms, that formed the basis for judging a successful


During the seven months we worked to acquire the building, we assumed that there were also other actively-interested parties, but we never knew the identities of these other parties, nor their intended plans for the building, nor any financial aspect of their proposed purchase or rental. The owner kept all such information strictly confidential, and not one of these parties came forward to us or otherwise made themselves known during all the time we met publicly prior to acquisition.
Alternate proposed uses for the building that we by now have heard of variously included: a bowling alley, a movie theater, a live theatre, an orchestra rehearsal space, a co-working space, a thrift store, a burning-man-oriented live/work/party space, several kinds of music or event venues, restaurants, cafes, and bars.
 
During the seven months we worked to acquire the building, we assumed that there were also other actively-interested parties, but our knowledge of other parties was confined to unsuccessful attempts such as that of the Parkway Theatre or the East Bay Depot for Creative Reuse. Crucially, we never knew the identities of any other active parties, their specific plans for the building, nor the timing or financial aspects of whatever proposed purchase, lease, or any other contractual aspects they may have been in negotiations over with the owner. The owner kept all such information strictly confidential, and none of these parties came forward to us or otherwise made themselves known during all the time we met publicly prior to acquisition.
 
In late April 2104, we received a form submission on our website from an email address we didn't know, informing us that the building had been sold to an unnamed party who planned to make it into a venue and were looking to 'rent out the top floor'.

Revision as of 21:25, 2 December 2014

History of the building

Built in 1934 as the Ligure Club, a neighborhood center for the local Italian-American community, the building served as a social nexus predominantly for the Oakland Scavenger Association, the largely Genoese refuse collectors who formed one of the Bay Area’s first worker-owned and operated co-operatives. From this time until the early 1980s, it served as the site for not only countless social events (concerts, dances, banquets, weddings, birthday parties), but major civic gatherings and lectures. Public speeches by the likes of presidents (Richard Nixon) and supreme court justices (Earl Warren) filled the building to capacity, along with regularly-held forums on local politics. Even sporting events like boxing matches and bocce ball tournaments were regularly held at the building.

As the neighborhood changed, by the early 1980s the building transitioned first to a community centered-club called The White House before becoming the infamous Omni nightclub and grill from the mid-80s through the 90s. Focusing mainly on rock and local metal scenes, it featured innumerable local musicians as well as well-known performers as diverse as Dr. John, McCoy Tyner, Bad Brains, Primus, and Crazy Horse.

From the mid-90s onward the property was carefully stewarded by a thoughtful couple who returned the building to its more diverse traditional use - albeit on a smaller scale - with a mixture of occasional social events (dances, weddings, birthday parties) as well as civic ones (political forums, neighborhood meetings), while also making it their workplace and home.

History of the Omni Commons

In late October 2013, Temescal poet and artist Zach Houston, who had known the present owners for many years, introduced the owners to the Bay Area Public School and Sudo Room as we were searching for a new location.

Emerging out of the Occupy movement, these two groups had already formed a collectively-run space in downtown Oakland that, for approximately two years, was made freely available for meetings and events to all other local groups and individuals who shared a vision of a more equitable commoning of resources and meeting of human needs over private interest or corporate profit. When the opportunity to move to the far-larger Omni building presented itself, we started meeting weekly to build support for a far more ambitious version of what we then able to provide: To found a truly expansive Commons with a wide range of diverse resources and multiple meeting spaces for all of Oakland to participate in.

For seven straight months, we held open, widely-publicized meetings, reaching out to all aligned groups and individuals who might want to have a home with us at Omni. Through a consensus-driven process across a multiplicity of groups, many thousands of hours were put in towards creating an effective, non-hierarchical internal working structure, assembling business plans and projections for each of the member groups, and building our collective fund. With no investors of any kind (and no profit motive), all the financial support for this project came entirely from within our own community in the form of donations and long-term, no-interest loans.

In March 2014, we held a one-day speaking event focusing on the social need for a Commons at the Omni, featuring writers Silvia Federici, Peter Linebaugh, and George Caffentzis.

In early May of that year, we signed our first agreement with the owner of the building and gave him a deposit. For the next six weeks, the terms of the lease and our option to purchase were painstakingly negotiated on a daily basis with the owner (lease revisions stretched far into the hundreds). By late June, the lease had been finalized and signed, and the Omni Commons assumed possession of the property on July 1.

Others' efforts to acquire the building

For most of the two years that the building was known as being available to let or purchase, it was not officially on the market, and by the time Omni Commons was involved there was no 'bidding' process as conventionally understood. Rather, the owner was approached directly and independently by a number of interested parties, enticed not only by the unique nature of the property but by the owner's unusual standing offer of a seller-financed loan. To qualify for the owner's loan, prospective buyers were to present the owner with business plans for his consideration. Likewise, those wanting to rent the property also had to present the owner with business plans. To the best of our understanding, it was these business plans as visions for the building, as well as the achievement of mutually-agreeable specific lease or purchase terms, that formed the basis for judging a successful

Alternate proposed uses for the building that we by now have heard of variously included: a bowling alley, a movie theater, a live theatre, an orchestra rehearsal space, a co-working space, a thrift store, a burning-man-oriented live/work/party space, several kinds of music or event venues, restaurants, cafes, and bars.

During the seven months we worked to acquire the building, we assumed that there were also other actively-interested parties, but our knowledge of other parties was confined to unsuccessful attempts such as that of the Parkway Theatre or the East Bay Depot for Creative Reuse. Crucially, we never knew the identities of any other active parties, their specific plans for the building, nor the timing or financial aspects of whatever proposed purchase, lease, or any other contractual aspects they may have been in negotiations over with the owner. The owner kept all such information strictly confidential, and none of these parties came forward to us or otherwise made themselves known during all the time we met publicly prior to acquisition.

In late April 2104, we received a form submission on our website from an email address we didn't know, informing us that the building had been sold to an unnamed party who planned to make it into a venue and were looking to 'rent out the top floor'.