Difference between revisions of "Event:2014/07/31 Weekly Delegates Meeting"
(Created page with "=July 31 Weekly Delegates Meeting=") |
Tunabananas (talk | contribs) (added agenda for next week) |
||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
July 31 Weekly Delegates Meeting | |||
=Agenda= | |||
==Posting of Privileged Data== | |||
* Status of wiki for privileged data | |||
==Working Groups== | |||
* Upcoming Working Group Meetings | |||
* Working Groups that need new facilitators | |||
* CDC Flyering this Sunday? | |||
* Status of Permit Working Group? | |||
===Legal / Governance Reportback=== | |||
* Proposal for new meeting format (Jenny) | |||
==Proposal Revision to Consensus Process:== | |||
Proposal : New Voting Model | |||
All votes called by the Delegate Council are subject to two rounds of voting. The first round passes by full consensus. If after friendly amendments and conversation full consensus cannot be achieved, the vote moves to a second round which passes by 2/3 majority. If this second vote fails to pass, the vote does not carry. | |||
This amendment to our full consensus voting procedures is proposed in light of advice from radical comrades and colleagues who have seen groups and projects torn apart by bad-faith exploitation of full consensus voting. Our group's aim and aspiration will always be full consensus, and we will always work to make sure all voices are heard. In all of our work and decisionmaking together, let us always be guided by fairness, kindness, and justice. |
Revision as of 19:08, 25 July 2014
July 31 Weekly Delegates Meeting
Agenda
Posting of Privileged Data
- Status of wiki for privileged data
Working Groups
- Upcoming Working Group Meetings
- Working Groups that need new facilitators
- CDC Flyering this Sunday?
- Status of Permit Working Group?
Legal / Governance Reportback
- Proposal for new meeting format (Jenny)
Proposal Revision to Consensus Process:
Proposal : New Voting Model
All votes called by the Delegate Council are subject to two rounds of voting. The first round passes by full consensus. If after friendly amendments and conversation full consensus cannot be achieved, the vote moves to a second round which passes by 2/3 majority. If this second vote fails to pass, the vote does not carry.
This amendment to our full consensus voting procedures is proposed in light of advice from radical comrades and colleagues who have seen groups and projects torn apart by bad-faith exploitation of full consensus voting. Our group's aim and aspiration will always be full consensus, and we will always work to make sure all voices are heard. In all of our work and decisionmaking together, let us always be guided by fairness, kindness, and justice.